Well Mikael, I thought it pretty clear from my post that the comparison was the HYPOCRICY of Gore (lecturing others about pollution while he pollutes 20 times what they do) versus the HYPOCRICY of calling Hitler NOT an anti-semite (given that he killed roughly six million jews). Obviously Gore hasn't invaded any countries, started a world war etc. But Gore IS just as hypocritical as anyone who would maintain the Hilter was NOT anti-semetic (oh and BTW, thanks for your etymology lesson on the word anti-semite. You know damn well that the current usage of the word is to indicate one who does not like jews. I could use the words jew-hater if you want).

Need more proof?

Here it is:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...006029,00.html


That's right folks, Al Gore, patron saiont of global warming, is paying HIMSELF to POLLUTE! He buys his "carbon offsets" from a company he owns.

So in light of this I am changing my Hitler comparison. Based on the Gore-carbon-offsets-"logic", Hitler most definitely was NOT an anti-semite! Gore pays himself to pollute and he's an environmentalist so when Hitler paid himself (he was the head of the German gov't) to kill jews he became a Zionist!!!