Well.......
Obviously I disagree with him (I think we were RIGHT to go into Iraq and Bush did NOT lie about it) but he has his right to his view and unlike the DEMOCRATS he has been CONSISTENT in his view and hasn't used it as an excuse to accuse our troops of every war crime under the sun.

BUT MORE TO THE POINT, why is it that I (a war supporter) am more comfortable with his protesting than the very party that says they're against this war?

Again, I can understand Pelosi thinking, "this guy looks like a nutjob. I am not going to let him get too close (physical distance) to me". I understand the secret service doing their job. I DON'T understand why they seemed so afraid to let him get anywhere within a camera shot. You know have a camera shot of Pelosi speaking or whatever with the protesters way in the background. If I were Pelosi AND truly anti-war, that is what I would have done?

Could it be however, that wilthrill was right when he said Pelosi et al don't CARE about the war? THEY CARE ABOUT THE POLITICAL GAINS THEY MIGHT MAKE FROM THE WAR!!!!

Oh, and PS, whatever you may think of his view, I DO think this country would be a much better place if more people would become somewhat informed and actually have the balls to protest that with which they disagree!!!! For example we wouldn't have nearly the problem we have with illegals if more people would do a "clone 9" and take to the streets!!!