Bush Administration to the LEFT of Jimmy Carter

wilthrill · 04-14-2008, 09:06 AM

Last week it was announced that former President Jimmy Carter is going to meet with the Hamas terrorist group. My first thoughts were well of course leave it to that Peanuthead Carter to find some terrorists to schmooze up to. Carter has a long record of LOVING socialist dictators even going so far as to falsely uphold clearly FRAUDULENT elections that "elect" them.

Bu then I saw this story which basically points out that the Bush administration is not only talking to terrorists but ACTIVELY supporting them.

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=61493

If Wilthrill RULED then the Bush administration would be facing impeachment proceedings for negotiating with terrorists and some how we'd strip Carter of his ex-presidency!!!!

Mikael · 04-14-2008, 11:55 AM

lol!!!

PITBOSS · 04-15-2008, 11:51 PM

All I can say is Carter's a brave man to call out Israel like he did in his book. He's now an anti-semite.

Didn't the US create Hamas anyway?

wilthrill · 04-16-2008, 08:42 AM

I haven't read Carter's book. What did he say about Israel?

wilthrill · 04-16-2008, 09:29 AM

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=61655

from the article:
Carter paid a visit to the gravesite of Arafat, who is buried just outside the Muqata. Palestinian officials who escorted Carter told WND the former president paused for a moment of silence at Arafat's grave before laying a wreathe there.

The Palestinian officials quoted Carter stating Arafat was a "peace fighter and a dear friend of mine."

They also quoted Carter calling Arafat a "partner in representing the question of justice in the world."

Ok, this part is simple. If Carter thinks that Arafat was a "peace fighter" then Carter has either lost his marbles OR really does love terrorists because Arafat was a TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE of a TERRORIST. A "peace fighter" doesn't blow up innocent children etc.
Ghandi = peace fighter
Martin Luther King = peace fighter

Exactly how many people did they blow up? ZERO!!!

From the article:
The officials said Carter repeatedly accused Israel of not implementing its side of agreements that called on the Jewish state to ease travel restrictions for Palestinians and to dismantle what are termed illegal outposts, or West Bank Jewish communities constructed without governmental permission.

Oh really Mr Carter??? Well how about when Israel DID fulfill it's side of the agreement to give back the Gaza strip and as a reward was greeted by ROCKET FIRE within DAYS of turning that land over?
How about the Palestinians honoring their side of the agreements? For example the Gaza giveback agreement did not OBLIGATE the palestinians to begin firing rockets into Israel. In fact I'm pretty sure it required the OPPOSITE!! That agreement also GAVE several large greenhouses (worth literally hundreds of millions of dollars. 80% of the roses used in the Rose Bowl came from there) to the Palestinians so they could provide jobs for their people. Within 1 WEEK the Palestinians had DESTROYED those greenhouses and within a month were complaining about not having jobs!!!!

Why is it that we have NEVER heard Carter criticize the Palestinians?

wilthrill · 04-16-2008, 09:53 AM

http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=79143

It is a video clip of a Hamas leader saying that Carter's visit will help end the US attempt to isolate Hamas from the world community.

So somebody please help me out here. The State Department has listed Hamas as a terrorist organization. If I were to go to Syria hold a press conference and give Hamas a $10,000,000 check I would be ARRESTED for supporting terrorism. The current President could do what I can't because he is in charge of foreign policy. The current President could also send someone else to do what I can't for the same reason.

BUT A PRIVATE CITIZEN can't!!! A private citizen would go to jail for supporting a terrorist group!!

So how is it that Carter (a private citizen acting WITHOUT direction from the current President) can go over there and give Hamas something worth FAR MORE than $10,000,000 and NOT face any charges? How can he support a terrorist organization and be punished LESS THAN the typical JAYWALKER????

PITBOSS · 04-17-2008, 01:12 AM

Hamas was created by Israel to counter the PLO.

Israel has murdered way more children than Hamas could dream of.

I'm going to have to look into Arafat some, I do know that both he and Carter have won the Nobel Peace Prize.

I don't know how Carter was able to visit Hamas, I would think someone gave him permission. Surely it would have looked worse to deny him on a peaceful mission.

wilthrill · 04-17-2008, 10:40 AM

Well it would be interesting to know WHO gave him permission. It pretty much would have had to have been Bush or Condi Rice.

Funny story,

I asked a Tennessee Supreme Court Justice if I went to Syria, held a press conference and gave Hamas a $10,000,000 check, could I be arrested for supporting a terrorist organization. He said yes, I could if the state dept had designated them as a terrorist organization like Hamas.

I said, and that's because the Executive Branch sets foreign policy and thus I'd be running afoul of them.
He said yes

Then I said, well what if I was a former president. He recognized the allusion to Carter, chuckled, and then changed his answer saying he didn't think there was a law against it.

One thing wilthrill has learned is it is not a good idea to embarrass a Supreme Court Justice, especially if you plan to ever practice law in his state so Wilthrill SHUT THE HELL UP.

But I laughed my ass all the way to the car because I KNOW DAMN WELL that there is a law against supporting terrorist organization and in fact we have people in jail in this country for doing just that.

So my question remains, If Carter can not show that he was given permission by the Executive Branch then why isn't he be arrested for supporting a terrorist organization?

Wilthrill's theory - the repubs are too PUSSY to actually prosecute Carter. It might make the Democrats/drive-by media "offended" and the Repubs still labor under the delusion that if they are "nice enough" to the drive-bys then the drive-bys might like them.

04-14-2008, 09:06 AM	#1 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 42	Bush Administration to the LEFT of Jimmy Carter Last week it was announced that former President Jimmy Carter is going to meet with the Hamas terrorist group. My first thoughts were well of course leave it to that Peanuthead Carter to find some terrorists to schmooze up to. Carter has a long record of LOVING socialist dictators even going so far as to falsely uphold clearly FRAUDULENT elections that "elect" them. Bu then I saw this story which basically points out that the Bush administration is not only talking to terrorists but ACTIVELY supporting them. http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=61493 If Wilthrill RULED then the Bush administration would be facing impeachment proceedings for negotiating with terrorists and some how we'd strip Carter of his ex-presidency!!!!

04-14-2008, 11:55 AM	#2 (permalink)
Mikael Band Member Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Down In a Hole Posts: 847 Rep Power: 42	lol!!! __________________ I just saved a ton of money on car insurance by switching to no car insurance!!! www.myspace.com/13468360

04-15-2008, 11:51 PM	#3 (permalink)
PITBOSS Screamo for Emo Join Date: May 2005 Location: Grand Bay Age: 33 Posts: 244 Rep Power: 37	All I can say is Carter's a brave man to call out Israel like he did in his book. He's now an anti-semite. Didn't the US create Hamas anyway?

04-16-2008, 08:42 AM	#4 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 42	I haven't read Carter's book. What did he say about Israel?

04-16-2008, 09:29 AM	#5 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 42	http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=61655 from the article: Carter paid a visit to the gravesite of Arafat, who is buried just outside the Muqata. Palestinian officials who escorted Carter told WND the former president paused for a moment of silence at Arafat's grave before laying a wreathe there. The Palestinian officials quoted Carter stating Arafat was a "peace fighter and a dear friend of mine." They also quoted Carter calling Arafat a "partner in representing the question of justice in the world." Ok, this part is simple. If Carter thinks that Arafat was a "peace fighter" then Carter has either lost his marbles OR really does love terrorists because Arafat was a TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE of a TERRORIST. A "peace fighter" doesn't blow up innocent children etc. Ghandi = peace fighter Martin Luther King = peace fighter Exactly how many people did they blow up? ZERO!!! From the article: The officials said Carter repeatedly accused Israel of not implementing its side of agreements that called on the Jewish state to ease travel restrictions for Palestinians and to dismantle what are termed illegal outposts, or West Bank Jewish communities constructed without governmental permission. Oh really Mr Carter??? Well how about when Israel DID fulfill it's side of the agreement to give back the Gaza strip and as a reward was greeted by ROCKET FIRE within DAYS of turning that land over? How about the Palestinians honoring their side of the agreements? For example the Gaza giveback agreement did not OBLIGATE the palestinians to begin firing rockets into Israel. In fact I'm pretty sure it required the OPPOSITE!! That agreement also GAVE several large greenhouses (worth literally hundreds of millions of dollars. 80% of the roses used in the Rose Bowl came from there) to the Palestinians so they could provide jobs for their people. Within 1 WEEK the Palestinians had DESTROYED those greenhouses and within a month were complaining about not having jobs!!!! Why is it that we have NEVER heard Carter criticize the Palestinians?

04-16-2008, 09:53 AM	#6 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 42	http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=79143 It is a video clip of a Hamas leader saying that Carter's visit will help end the US attempt to isolate Hamas from the world community. So somebody please help me out here. The State Department has listed Hamas as a terrorist organization. If I were to go to Syria hold a press conference and give Hamas a $10,000,000 check I would be ARRESTED for supporting terrorism. The current President could do what I can't because he is in charge of foreign policy. The current President could also send someone else to do what I can't for the same reason. BUT A PRIVATE CITIZEN can't!!! A private citizen would go to jail for supporting a terrorist group!! So how is it that Carter (a private citizen acting WITHOUT direction from the current President) can go over there and give Hamas something worth FAR MORE than $10,000,000 and NOT face any charges? How can he support a terrorist organization and be punished LESS THAN the typical JAYWALKER????

04-17-2008, 01:12 AM	#7 (permalink)
PITBOSS Screamo for Emo Join Date: May 2005 Location: Grand Bay Age: 33 Posts: 244 Rep Power: 37	Hamas was created by Israel to counter the PLO. Israel has murdered way more children than Hamas could dream of. I'm going to have to look into Arafat some, I do know that both he and Carter have won the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't know how Carter was able to visit Hamas, I would think someone gave him permission. Surely it would have looked worse to deny him on a peaceful mission.

04-17-2008, 10:40 AM	#8 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 42	Well it would be interesting to know WHO gave him permission. It pretty much would have had to have been Bush or Condi Rice. Funny story, I asked a Tennessee Supreme Court Justice if I went to Syria, held a press conference and gave Hamas a $10,000,000 check, could I be arrested for supporting a terrorist organization. He said yes, I could if the state dept had designated them as a terrorist organization like Hamas. I said, and that's because the Executive Branch sets foreign policy and thus I'd be running afoul of them. He said yes Then I said, well what if I was a former president. He recognized the allusion to Carter, chuckled, and then changed his answer saying he didn't think there was a law against it. One thing wilthrill has learned is it is not a good idea to embarrass a Supreme Court Justice, especially if you plan to ever practice law in his state so Wilthrill SHUT THE HELL UP. But I laughed my ass all the way to the car because I KNOW DAMN WELL that there is a law against supporting terrorist organization and in fact we have people in jail in this country for doing just that. So my question remains, If Carter can not show that he was given permission by the Executive Branch then why isn't he be arrested for supporting a terrorist organization? Wilthrill's theory - the repubs are too PUSSY to actually prosecute Carter. It might make the Democrats/drive-by media "offended" and the Repubs still labor under the delusion that if they are "nice enough" to the drive-bys then the drive-bys might like them.