National Security, Sandy Burglar & Lie Detector

wilthrill · 02-02-2007, 08:42 AM

http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...1614-2703r.htm

You guys remember Sandy Burglar the Clinton administration national security advisor who was caught red-handed in the National Archives stuffing classified documents in his pants in an attempt to STEAL them???

You might not remember but when originally caught he first claimed it was an "oversight". He then admitted theft but said he had taken COPIES only. And then finally he admitted that he had taken ORIGINALS.

Well, as part of Mr Burglar's plea agreement he AGREED to take a polygragh (lie detector). This is important because to this VERY DAY the National Archives does not know all of the documents he took. These are CLASSIFIED documents and Stevie Wonder could see WHY we need to know this!!!

And yet the BUSH Justice Dept doesn't seem interested. Why???

Folks, if JESUS CHRIST, himself, had stolen those docs we'd still need to be ABSOLUTELY SURE about WHICH documents were stolen. Which means we'd be hooking Jesus up to a lie detector.

Why should Berger be treated any differently? He AGREED to the lie detector in his plea deal. If any of you violated the terms of a plea agreement what do you think would happen???

And WHY is the headline "GOP urges Berger lie test"? Well, that is because NOT ONE DEMOCRAT has publicly urged Berger to take the test. Do you DEMOCRATS not care about National Security?

But of course the mainstream media is too concerned with that dead horse (Barbaro) than with actually covering real news like this or the armed mexican invasion going on at the border.

02-02-2007, 08:42 AM	#1 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 818 Rep Power: 44	National Security, Sandy Burglar & Lie Detector http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...1614-2703r.htm You guys remember Sandy Burglar the Clinton administration national security advisor who was caught red-handed in the National Archives stuffing classified documents in his pants in an attempt to STEAL them??? You might not remember but when originally caught he first claimed it was an "oversight". He then admitted theft but said he had taken COPIES only. And then finally he admitted that he had taken ORIGINALS. Well, as part of Mr Burglar's plea agreement he AGREED to take a polygragh (lie detector). This is important because to this VERY DAY the National Archives does not know all of the documents he took. These are CLASSIFIED documents and Stevie Wonder could see WHY we need to know this!!! And yet the BUSH Justice Dept doesn't seem interested. Why??? Folks, if JESUS CHRIST, himself, had stolen those docs we'd still need to be ABSOLUTELY SURE about WHICH documents were stolen. Which means we'd be hooking Jesus up to a lie detector. Why should Berger be treated any differently? He AGREED to the lie detector in his plea deal. If any of you violated the terms of a plea agreement what do you think would happen??? And WHY is the headline "GOP urges Berger lie test"? Well, that is because NOT ONE DEMOCRAT has publicly urged Berger to take the test. Do you DEMOCRATS not care about National Security? But of course the mainstream media is too concerned with that dead horse (Barbaro) than with actually covering real news like this or the armed mexican invasion going on at the border. Last edited by wilthrill; 02-02-2007 at 08:46 AM.