Well if you need more proof of Gore's hypocrisy, here it is:
OK, in Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth", Gore said that 1998 was the hottest year on record and 9 of the ten hottest years were in the 1990's.
Well it turns out that NASA was using faulty temperature data.
http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+fin...rticle8383.htm
From the article:
"These graphs were created by NASA's Reto Ruedy and James Hansen (who shot to fame when he accused the administration of trying to censor his views on climate change). Hansen refused to provide McKintyre with the algorithm used to generate graph data, so McKintyre reverse-engineered it. The result appeared to be a Y2K bug in the handling of the raw data."
So Mr Hansen (the darling of the global warming crowd) didn't want his data to be peer-reviewed. WHAT KIND OF SCIENTIST DOESN"T WANT HIS WORK CORROBORATED BY OTHERS?? I wonder why. Perhaps the article provides an answer;
"NASA has now silently released corrected figures, and the changes are truly astounding. The warmest year on record is now 1934. 1998 (long trumpeted by the media as record-breaking) moves to second place. 1921 takes third. In fact, 5 of the 10 warmest years on record now all occur before World War II."
Kind of blows that 9 of the ten warmest years in the 90's argument OUT OF THE WATER doesn't it!
Now you may ask, "but what if Gore were just mistaken like Nasa?" Well if he were mistaken and had a shred of intellectual honesty, you'd think he might admit it or at least shut up. But if so, YOU DON'T KNOW AL!!!
Because AFTER being faced with this story of Nasa's MISTAKE Gore said this:
"There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10m a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community," Gore said at a forum in Singapore.
"In actuality, there is very little disagreement."
Gore compared the campaign to that of the millions of dollars spent by US tobacco companies years ago on creating the appearance of uncertainty and debate within the scientific community on the harmful effects of smoking cigarettes.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai.../eagore107.xml
So EVEN AFTER HE HAS THE REAL DATA, Al CONTINUES the lie. THAT would be hypocritical enough but wait there's more.
Gore criticizes those who disagree with him as being paid by Big Oil and yet somehow fails to mention that HE stands to make literally millions if not billions of dollars from global warming.
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpress.c...lobal-warming/
I THINK YOU'LL BE HARD-PRESSED TO FIND ANY OTHER SINGLE PERSON WHO STANDS TO MAKE SO MUCH MONEY FROM A POSITION HE'S ADVOCATING. And he has the nerve to question the motives of those who disagree with him??????
AL GORE IS A POMPOUS INCREDIBLY WRONG HYPOCRITE AND UNLESS THE NOBEL IS A PRIZE FOR LYING IDIOTS GORE DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME BREATH AS IT!!!!
