?'s the Drive by's will NOT ask Hillary

wilthrill · 10-31-2007, 10:57 AM

EVERY SINGLE ONE of these questions has to do with HILLARY's conduct not Bill's.
EVERY SINGLE ONE of these questions would be asked ad nauseum of any REPUBLICAN with the same background as HILLARY.
NONE of these questions will be asked of Hillary by ANY member of the drive-by media.

1. What SPECIFICALLY qualifies you to be President of the US?
hint: being a good mother, loyal wife, and woman does NOT! Otherwise we have roughly 100,000,000 women in this country who qualify. Hell let's just do away with election and have a monkey throw shit at a phone book and the first womans' name he hits is the next President.

2. As a feminist do you think it proper to refer to women who charge sexual harassment etc as "bimbos" or "what you get when you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park"?

3. What were 900 FBI files doing in the White House basement in the care of a former bar bouncer you hired as chief of security at the White House?

4. Do you honestly believe that chinese dishwashers with no REAL addresses are donating a thousand dollars a pop to your campaign? Where'd they get the money?

5. Why do you support the issuing of drivers licenses to illegal immigrants in your state of New York?

6. How did you earned a mathmatically impossible rate of return on your $10,000 cattlegate investment?

7. Why do you support partial-birth abortion and how will you answer those few in your party who don't?

8. Why is a convicted felon who STOLE documents from the National Archives one of your most trusted advisors and doesn't that send a signal that you support his conduct?

9. What specifically will you do about illegal immigration?

10. What specifically will you do in Iraq? You've campaigned saying bring the troops home, why won't you promise to do so by 2013?

The Wayniac · 10-31-2007, 08:29 PM

Quote:

9. What specifically will you do about illegal immigration?

Specifically, I want to know what she is going to do THIS time that her and her husband DID NOT DO last time..... ?

wilthrill · 11-01-2007, 07:45 AM

Yes LTS it DOES apply specifically to Hillary because she has been given a pass on more issues than ANY candidate in my lifetime.

Although Wilthrill being self-correcting has to acknowledge Tim Russert (the ONLY drive-by I've seen ask Hillary ANY tough questions) who at the democratic debate did actually ask Hillary about the illegal licenses in New York.

He said Ms Clinton in a New Hampshire newspaper recently you said of Governor Spitzer's plan to give drivers licenses to illegals "it makes sense". So do you support Spitzer's plan?

Hillary spent approximately a minute blaming Bush for not passing amnesty (note to Hillary: Bush wasn't the reason amnesty failed. Amnesty failed because literally MILLIONS of those pesky VOTERS raised hell) and then said she did not support it.

Ubercreep Chris Dodd, of all people, called her on it saying, "you just said it makes sense".

Hillary said, "I never said that"

Which prompted even Barak Obama to say "I still don't understand her answer. Is she for it or against it?"

Hillary's people blamed Russert for being "belligerent" (how dare he ask a question on the single most important domestic issue of this campaign) and then said Hillary was "ill served by her briefing book" (sort of like that Clinton aid in the 90's who was caught lying to Congress by his own diary and said the diary was lying!).

And BTW, Wayniac, Hillary's non-answer PROVES CONCLUSIVELY that she DOES support illegal immigration because ANYONE who doesn't could easily answer the question of whether illegals deserve drivers' licenses!!!!

She supports it because she wants the illegal vote!!! And THAT, in and of itself, is enough of a reason she should NEVER be President!!!!

Mikael · 11-04-2007, 02:39 AM

Hillary's getting a "pass"? No, more like they (the media) realize for better or worse Hillary is the most likely Dem. nominee. Fred Thompson, Barrack Obama-they're getting the "pass".
But, I should interject, it's good to see that after this last week Hillary is being challenged.
As for this constant hatred of Clinton, it's ridiculous. Bill Clinton only continued the path that H.W. Bush set forth. NAFTA, was begun under Bush I, and so was the move towards China's status as a trading partner.
And we all know our current Bush favors amnesty.

Just_Lee · 11-04-2007, 07:36 AM

The constant hatred for Clinton is much like the constant hatred for Bush. It really won't get us anywhere. Republicans, Democrats...they all suck. But...you have to vote your heart and hope for the best I guess.

wilthrill · 11-05-2007, 03:13 PM

Mikael if Hillary is indeed the "most likely democrat nominee" (and I agree she is) THAT justifies EVEN TOUGHER questions for her (as well as the republican nominee) because she is running for PRESIDENT of the US not some local dog catcher job. If the press doesn't have a DUTY to ask tough questions of people likely to become President then why the hell do we have a free press anyway???

As for Fred Thompson's alleged "pass" I note that this week he has been questioned FAR MORE on his pot smoking advisor than Hillary has on her "national archives stealing of documents" advisor Sandy Berger. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that STEALING DOCUMENTS from the National Archives is somewhat more serious than smoking a joint!!! Hell, Berger STILL hasn't told us ALL of the documents that he stole or taken the lie detector that he AGREED TO as part of his plea bargain. And yet Hillary has not been challenged on this by EVEN ONE MEMBER of the drive-by's.

I agree that the republicans aren't any better for the most part although I DO find Hillary to be MORE of a threat because she is socialism fast and the repubs are socialism slow.

As for the "hatred" of Ms Clinton why is it "hatred" for me to oppose a candidate who is opposed to EVERYTHING I hold dear?

If candidate X supported big gov't, higher taxes, gun- control, partial birth abortion, gay marriage, appeasement as foreign policy, affirmative action, hate crime law, amnesty for illegals etc I would oppose candidate X. Furthermore, I have been quite vocal in opposing REPUBLICANS when they run afoul of my ideals. Immigration is just the latest example. Some others include the notion that free trade is always good, that our sovereignty should be subject to international law, that we should nominate someone with virtually NO EXPERIENCE (Harriet Myers) to the Supreme Court etc.

You know if offered the chance to have a beer with George W or Bill Clinton, I'd pick Clinton (despite the fact that politically speaking I disagreed with him more than Bush) because he'd probably be a funner guy to have a beer with.

In short I opposed candidates because THEY oppose my values. THAT is not hatred! It 's called good citizenship!!!

wilthrill · 11-05-2007, 06:07 PM

No, standing for your beliefs is not "outright hatred and contempt"!!

wilthrill · 11-05-2007, 06:15 PM

And another thing, you talk of those of us who oppose Clinton as being full of "hatred and contempt".

Well we didn't blame Clinton for EVERY NATURAL disaster that occured on his watch. No one, for example blamed Clinton for any of the hurricanes or wildfires that occured on his watch the way you Bushhatas claim Bush caused the HURRICANE Katrina ITSELF or the wildfires that burned California last week. Clinton was at war also (Bosnia) and yet NONE of the Clinton "haters" blamed Clinton saying if we weren't in Bosnia we'd have more National Guard Resources here at home the way SEVERAL democrat members of Congress have Bush!!!

Furthermore, despite all the "hatred" displayed by Clinton's opponents NONE of them suggested that Clinton and his family should be STONED TO DEATH (Alec Baldwin about Henry Hyde) and there were no movies about the ASSASINATION of Bill Clinton that the Hollywood left defended as there were about BUSH!!!

So who really deals in "hatred"????

10-31-2007, 10:57 AM	#1 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	?'s the Drive by's will NOT ask Hillary EVERY SINGLE ONE of these questions has to do with HILLARY's conduct not Bill's. EVERY SINGLE ONE of these questions would be asked ad nauseum of any REPUBLICAN with the same background as HILLARY. NONE of these questions will be asked of Hillary by ANY member of the drive-by media. 1. What SPECIFICALLY qualifies you to be President of the US? hint: being a good mother, loyal wife, and woman does NOT! Otherwise we have roughly 100,000,000 women in this country who qualify. Hell let's just do away with election and have a monkey throw shit at a phone book and the first womans' name he hits is the next President. 2. As a feminist do you think it proper to refer to women who charge sexual harassment etc as "bimbos" or "what you get when you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park"? 3. What were 900 FBI files doing in the White House basement in the care of a former bar bouncer you hired as chief of security at the White House? 4. Do you honestly believe that chinese dishwashers with no REAL addresses are donating a thousand dollars a pop to your campaign? Where'd they get the money? 5. Why do you support the issuing of drivers licenses to illegal immigrants in your state of New York? 6. How did you earned a mathmatically impossible rate of return on your $10,000 cattlegate investment? 7. Why do you support partial-birth abortion and how will you answer those few in your party who don't? 8. Why is a convicted felon who STOLE documents from the National Archives one of your most trusted advisors and doesn't that send a signal that you support his conduct? 9. What specifically will you do about illegal immigration? 10. What specifically will you do in Iraq? You've campaigned saying bring the troops home, why won't you promise to do so by 2013?

11-04-2007, 02:39 AM	#4 (permalink)
Mikael Band Member Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Down In a Hole Posts: 905 Rep Power: 45	Hillary's getting a "pass"? No, more like they (the media) realize for better or worse Hillary is the most likely Dem. nominee. Fred Thompson, Barrack Obama-they're getting the "pass". But, I should interject, it's good to see that after this last week Hillary is being challenged. As for this constant hatred of Clinton, it's ridiculous. Bill Clinton only continued the path that H.W. Bush set forth. NAFTA, was begun under Bush I, and so was the move towards China's status as a trading partner. And we all know our current Bush favors amnesty. __________________ I just saved a ton of money on car insurance by switching to no car insurance!!! www.myspace.com/13468360

11-01-2007, 07:45 AM	#3 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	Yes LTS it DOES apply specifically to Hillary because she has been given a pass on more issues than ANY candidate in my lifetime. Although Wilthrill being self-correcting has to acknowledge Tim Russert (the ONLY drive-by I've seen ask Hillary ANY tough questions) who at the democratic debate did actually ask Hillary about the illegal licenses in New York. He said Ms Clinton in a New Hampshire newspaper recently you said of Governor Spitzer's plan to give drivers licenses to illegals "it makes sense". So do you support Spitzer's plan? Hillary spent approximately a minute blaming Bush for not passing amnesty (note to Hillary: Bush wasn't the reason amnesty failed. Amnesty failed because literally MILLIONS of those pesky VOTERS raised hell) and then said she did not support it. Ubercreep Chris Dodd, of all people, called her on it saying, "you just said it makes sense". Hillary said, "I never said that" Which prompted even Barak Obama to say "I still don't understand her answer. Is she for it or against it?" Hillary's people blamed Russert for being "belligerent" (how dare he ask a question on the single most important domestic issue of this campaign) and then said Hillary was "ill served by her briefing book" (sort of like that Clinton aid in the 90's who was caught lying to Congress by his own diary and said the diary was lying!). And BTW, Wayniac, Hillary's non-answer PROVES CONCLUSIVELY that she DOES support illegal immigration because ANYONE who doesn't could easily answer the question of whether illegals deserve drivers' licenses!!!! She supports it because she wants the illegal vote!!! And THAT, in and of itself, is enough of a reason she should NEVER be President!!!!

11-04-2007, 07:36 AM	#5 (permalink)
Just_Lee Band Member Screamo for Emo Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 161 Rep Power: 46	The constant hatred for Clinton is much like the constant hatred for Bush. It really won't get us anywhere. Republicans, Democrats...they all suck. But...you have to vote your heart and hope for the best I guess.

11-05-2007, 03:13 PM	#6 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	Mikael if Hillary is indeed the "most likely democrat nominee" (and I agree she is) THAT justifies EVEN TOUGHER questions for her (as well as the republican nominee) because she is running for PRESIDENT of the US not some local dog catcher job. If the press doesn't have a DUTY to ask tough questions of people likely to become President then why the hell do we have a free press anyway??? As for Fred Thompson's alleged "pass" I note that this week he has been questioned FAR MORE on his pot smoking advisor than Hillary has on her "national archives stealing of documents" advisor Sandy Berger. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that STEALING DOCUMENTS from the National Archives is somewhat more serious than smoking a joint!!! Hell, Berger STILL hasn't told us ALL of the documents that he stole or taken the lie detector that he AGREED TO as part of his plea bargain. And yet Hillary has not been challenged on this by EVEN ONE MEMBER of the drive-by's. I agree that the republicans aren't any better for the most part although I DO find Hillary to be MORE of a threat because she is socialism fast and the repubs are socialism slow. As for the "hatred" of Ms Clinton why is it "hatred" for me to oppose a candidate who is opposed to EVERYTHING I hold dear? If candidate X supported big gov't, higher taxes, gun- control, partial birth abortion, gay marriage, appeasement as foreign policy, affirmative action, hate crime law, amnesty for illegals etc I would oppose candidate X. Furthermore, I have been quite vocal in opposing REPUBLICANS when they run afoul of my ideals. Immigration is just the latest example. Some others include the notion that free trade is always good, that our sovereignty should be subject to international law, that we should nominate someone with virtually NO EXPERIENCE (Harriet Myers) to the Supreme Court etc. You know if offered the chance to have a beer with George W or Bill Clinton, I'd pick Clinton (despite the fact that politically speaking I disagreed with him more than Bush) because he'd probably be a funner guy to have a beer with. In short I opposed candidates because THEY oppose my values. THAT is not hatred! It 's called good citizenship!!!

11-05-2007, 06:07 PM	#7 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	No, standing for your beliefs is not "outright hatred and contempt"!!

11-05-2007, 06:15 PM	#8 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	And another thing, you talk of those of us who oppose Clinton as being full of "hatred and contempt". Well we didn't blame Clinton for EVERY NATURAL disaster that occured on his watch. No one, for example blamed Clinton for any of the hurricanes or wildfires that occured on his watch the way you Bushhatas claim Bush caused the HURRICANE Katrina ITSELF or the wildfires that burned California last week. Clinton was at war also (Bosnia) and yet NONE of the Clinton "haters" blamed Clinton saying if we weren't in Bosnia we'd have more National Guard Resources here at home the way SEVERAL democrat members of Congress have Bush!!! Furthermore, despite all the "hatred" displayed by Clinton's opponents NONE of them suggested that Clinton and his family should be STONED TO DEATH (Alec Baldwin about Henry Hyde) and there were no movies about the ASSASINATION of Bill Clinton that the Hollywood left defended as there were about BUSH!!! So who really deals in "hatred"????