U.S. to strike Iran on Good Friday? - Page 2

PITBOSS · 04-13-2007, 11:44 AM

I really don't see what the problem is with a nuclear Iran. Even with nukes, they would pose little or no threat to us. We have em out gunned.

The Good Reverend, MATCHEW · 04-13-2007, 11:48 AM

I say we inject the Nations stray cats and dogs with a deadly virus and then AIRDROP themn into Iraq.

putzdaddy · 04-13-2007, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATCHEW

I say we inject the Nations stray cats and dogs with a deadly virus and then AIRDROP themn into Iraq.

HA! No way, dude, PETA would flip! By the way, when is PETA gonna start lighting themselves on fire during protests. That's what I wanna see!

wilthrill · 04-16-2007, 05:15 PM

Putz, peta will NEVER start lighting themselves on fire in protest. Peta opposes barbeques.

Responding to my two tentative alternatives and request for more Putz says,

"I see, and it's not treasonous to lie to the nation to start bombing and occupying another country? Just getting my facts straight.

I say we concoct a good reason to occupy their country. Let's see WMD's! No...used that one already. Squashing the Commie threat! Damn...no more commies. I know! Let's tell everyone if they get nuclear power then they will certainly use that power to make bombs and take over the U.S. That's the ticket! Fear, fear, and more fear!"

Putz what do you mean it's not treasonous to lie to the nation to start bombing and occupy another country? I never said anything about lying about it. If it came down to bombing Iran, I'd explain my reasons were I the president. As for whether the Iranians would use a nuke THEY have pretty much said all we need to know on the subject. THEIR leader (Ineedajihad) says Israel should be wiped from the planet. A few nukes over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem would go a long way to making that a reality. THEIR leader believes he is paving the way for the 13th Iman who will pave the wave for Islamic control of the world.

Now, Ineedajihad MAY be crazy (he sure as hell sounds it). Perhaps MANY (if not the majority) of Iranians DON'T want to wipe Israel from planet Earth and WOULD NOT use a nuke!! In fact, I'd bet that were true!

But the Iranians who count (aka the ones who would have their fingers on the button) have made their position clear. THESE are NOT rational people with whom we can negotiate.

BUT anyway, I only gave two alternatives (and you can be pretty sure the Israelis are not going to sit by and do nothing for too much longer since they are the ones most directly threatened). What am I missing?

Krafty Ken · 04-17-2007, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PITBOSS

I really don't see what the problem is with a nuclear Iran. Even with nukes, they would pose little or no threat to us. We have em out gunned.

That doesn't mean they still wouldn't use the bomb on us! First they are taking out the Jews, then they are coming after us. The don't call us the GREAT Satan and Israel the little Satan for their health. Just wait until North Korea gives them a missle that can hit us, then you'll be shitting your pants. How many times do we have to hear death to the jews and death to America before we take these people seriously?

PITBOSS · 04-17-2007, 08:18 AM

That would be a best case scenario. If they strike Israel, Israel strikes back...........problem solved.

wilthrill · 04-17-2007, 05:39 PM

So you like the "let Israel handle it" option, Pitboss.

Are you concerned with it possibly escalting into a regional war? And if it did is America (treasonous drive by media and the roughly fifty percent who honestly disagree with war in Iraq) prepared to do what would be necessary to win such a conflict?

PITBOSS · 04-17-2007, 10:36 PM

If there is an act of war against us, of course its time to get in on the action. Until then, wouldn't you think our best course of action is on the sidelines?

wilthrill · 04-23-2007, 05:32 PM

Well you know Pitboss when men were men I would say I agree. Just let Israel handle it and if it does escalate America will step up to the plate and once again spill its blood to protect freedom etc.

But that would require guts and actually killing a shit load of people and from what I see you pretty much would have to literally hold a gun to our nation's head (ie attack us) BEFORE we would have the stomach to do it. It's like 911. We know another event is imminent but we are too politically correct to take the necessary measures (wouldn't want to offend any terrorists) and so it is going to take a much larger loss of life (possibly involving nukes) to get us to do what we must. In short, I'm afraid that the new castrati (aka American male) will wake up too late.

04-13-2007, 11:48 AM	#12 (permalink)
The Good Reverend, MATCHEW Agent Jones, at your service. GCB Senior Citizen Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 2,409 Rep Power: 34	I say we inject the Nations stray cats and dogs with a deadly virus and then AIRDROP themn into Iraq. __________________ www.Ko-Lija.com www.MySpace.com/KoLija www.MySpace.com/OSMUSICFEST

04-13-2007, 11:44 AM	#11 (permalink)
PITBOSS Band Whore Join Date: May 2005 Location: Grand Bay Age: 33 Posts: 309 Rep Power: 41	I really don't see what the problem is with a nuclear Iran. Even with nukes, they would pose little or no threat to us. We have em out gunned.

04-16-2007, 05:15 PM	#14 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	Putz, peta will NEVER start lighting themselves on fire in protest. Peta opposes barbeques. Responding to my two tentative alternatives and request for more Putz says, "I see, and it's not treasonous to lie to the nation to start bombing and occupying another country? Just getting my facts straight. I say we concoct a good reason to occupy their country. Let's see WMD's! No...used that one already. Squashing the Commie threat! Damn...no more commies. I know! Let's tell everyone if they get nuclear power then they will certainly use that power to make bombs and take over the U.S. That's the ticket! Fear, fear, and more fear!" Putz what do you mean it's not treasonous to lie to the nation to start bombing and occupy another country? I never said anything about lying about it. If it came down to bombing Iran, I'd explain my reasons were I the president. As for whether the Iranians would use a nuke THEY have pretty much said all we need to know on the subject. THEIR leader (Ineedajihad) says Israel should be wiped from the planet. A few nukes over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem would go a long way to making that a reality. THEIR leader believes he is paving the way for the 13th Iman who will pave the wave for Islamic control of the world. Now, Ineedajihad MAY be crazy (he sure as hell sounds it). Perhaps MANY (if not the majority) of Iranians DON'T want to wipe Israel from planet Earth and WOULD NOT use a nuke!! In fact, I'd bet that were true! But the Iranians who count (aka the ones who would have their fingers on the button) have made their position clear. THESE are NOT rational people with whom we can negotiate. BUT anyway, I only gave two alternatives (and you can be pretty sure the Israelis are not going to sit by and do nothing for too much longer since they are the ones most directly threatened). What am I missing?

04-17-2007, 08:18 AM	#16 (permalink)
PITBOSS Band Whore Join Date: May 2005 Location: Grand Bay Age: 33 Posts: 309 Rep Power: 41	That would be a best case scenario. If they strike Israel, Israel strikes back...........problem solved.

04-17-2007, 05:39 PM	#17 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	So you like the "let Israel handle it" option, Pitboss. Are you concerned with it possibly escalting into a regional war? And if it did is America (treasonous drive by media and the roughly fifty percent who honestly disagree with war in Iraq) prepared to do what would be necessary to win such a conflict?

04-17-2007, 10:36 PM	#18 (permalink)
PITBOSS Band Whore Join Date: May 2005 Location: Grand Bay Age: 33 Posts: 309 Rep Power: 41	If there is an act of war against us, of course its time to get in on the action. Until then, wouldn't you think our best course of action is on the sidelines?

04-23-2007, 05:32 PM	#19 (permalink)
wilthrill Band Whore Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 825 Rep Power: 46	Well you know Pitboss when men were men I would say I agree. Just let Israel handle it and if it does escalate America will step up to the plate and once again spill its blood to protect freedom etc. But that would require guts and actually killing a shit load of people and from what I see you pretty much would have to literally hold a gun to our nation's head (ie attack us) BEFORE we would have the stomach to do it. It's like 911. We know another event is imminent but we are too politically correct to take the necessary measures (wouldn't want to offend any terrorists) and so it is going to take a much larger loss of life (possibly involving nukes) to get us to do what we must. In short, I'm afraid that the new castrati (aka American male) will wake up too late.